<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName></PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Advanced Journal of Management, Humanity and Social Science</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>3092-7676</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>09</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Human Rights in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Legal Personhood, Responsibility, and Global Governance</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>114</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>126</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">244813</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.5281/zenodo.20616375</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Anita</FirstName>
					<LastName>Yousefi</LastName>
<Affiliation>PhD student in Public International Law, Islamic Azad University, Karaj Branch, Alborz, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Farideh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Afshani</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. Student in Public International Law, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>04</Month>
					<Day>04</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The rapid integration of artificial intelligence (AI) systems into core societal institutions—from criminal justice and welfare administration to employment and border governance—has generated unprecedented challenges for international human rights law. This article examines three intersecting dimensions of the AI-human rights nexus: the contested question of AI legal personhood, the allocation of responsibility for AI-induced harms across complex value chains, and the evolving architecture of global AI governance. Drawing on the Council of Europe&#039;s Framework Convention on Artificial Intelligence (2024), the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights as applied to AI (2025), and emerging regulatory frameworks including the EU AI Act, this analysis argues that granting legal personhood to AI systems is neither necessary nor desirable for effective accountability. Instead, a functional approach that mandates human rights due diligence throughout the AI lifecycle, establishes accessible remedy mechanisms for affected individuals, and promotes regulatory coherence across jurisdictions offers a more promising pathway. The article synthesises findings from a doctrinal analysis of 45 international legal instruments, UN reports, and scholarly sources to propose a rights-based governance framework centred on mandatory human rights impact assessments, independent oversight, and meaningful stakeholder engagement with affected communities.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Artificial intelligence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Human rights</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">legal personhood</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">global governance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Human Rights Due Diligence</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://www.ajmhss.com/article_244813_19d5600414425a9292879faadb9e36cd.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
