Advanced Journal of Management, Humanity and Social Science

Agile Implementation in Digital Transformation Projects of Public Sector Organizations

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Mahdi Noormohammad Khales 1
Mohammad Baradaran 2

1 Master of Science (M.Sc.) in Information Technology Management, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Information Technology Management, Islamic Azad University, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

10.5281/zenodo.20615604
Abstract
The integration of agile methodologies into digital transformation initiatives within public sector organizations represents a critical yet challenging endeavor in contemporary governance. This article examines the paradoxical relationship between Agile principles—emphasizing flexibility, iterative delivery, and self-organizing teams—and the inherently bureaucratic nature of public administration, characterized by hierarchical structures, rigid procurement frameworks, and risk-averse cultures. Through a systematic synthesis of empirical studies published between 2014 and 2025, this research identifies four primary categories of implementation challenges: institutional and regulatory barriers, procurement and contractual misalignments, cultural and resistance factors, and resource and capability constraints. The findings reveal that while agile adoption can significantly enhance transparency, responsiveness, and citizen-centered service delivery, successful implementation requires fundamental adaptations rather than wholesale methodological transplantation. A multidimensional framework proposed, integrating legal-procedural adaptations, hybrid governance models, tailored procurement mechanisms, cultural transformation strategies, and iterative implementation roadmaps. This research contributes to both public administration theory and digital government practice by providing evidence-based guidance for navigating the inherent tensions between agility and accountability in democratic governance contexts.

Graphical Abstract

Agile Implementation in Digital Transformation Projects of Public Sector Organizations

Keywords

Agile Methodology
Digital Transformation
Public Sector
E-government
Bureaucratic Adaptation
Subjects
[1]    Payomrat, N., Senapathi, M., & Madanian, S. (2025). Digital transformation in the public sector: A systematic mapping study from an agile perspective. In N. Carroll (Ed.), Research Handbook on Digital Transformation and Responsibility (pp. 75-96). Edward Elgar Publishing.
[2]    Binamungu, L. P., & Mahundi, M. (2022). Investigating the support for agility in developing government software systems: A case of three East African countries. Tanzania Journal of Engineering and Technology, 41(3), 1-13.
[3]    Monageng, T., & Esiefarienrhe, B. M. (2025). Transforming e-government projects by developing a RAF using Scrum integrated with CASE tool in Botswana. TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), 24(2).
[4]    Tai, K.-T., & Awasthi, P. (2025). An exploration of agile government in the public sector: A systematic literature review at macro, meso, and micro levels of analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 42(4), 102082.              
[5]    Kautz, T., & Winter, R. (2024). Striving to become agile in the public sector: A context theory perspective. In A. Lazazzara, R. Reina, & S. Za (Eds.), Towards Digital and Sustainable Organisations (pp. 75-96). Springer.  
[6]    Nuottila, J., Aaltonen, K., & Kujala, J. (2016). Challenges of adopting agile methods in a public organization. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 4(3), 4-20.           
[7]    Ciancarini, P., Giancarlo, R., & Grimaudo, G. (2024). Scrum@PA: Tailoring an agile methodology to the digital transformation in the public sector. Information, 15(2), 110.       
[8]    Mergel, I. (2016). Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 516-523.       
[9]    Janssen, M., & van der Voort, H. (2016). Adaptive governance: Towards a stable, accountable and responsive government. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 1-5.
[10] [13] Lappi, T., & Aaltonen, K. (2017). Project governance in public sector agile software projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(2), 263-294.
[11] Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. (2016). Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 119, 87-108.
[12] Conforto, E. C., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., & de Almeida, L. F. M. (2014). Can agile project management adopted by industries other than software development? Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21-34.
[13] Denning, S. (2016). How to make the whole organization "agile”? Strategy & Leadership, 44(4), 10-17.
[14] Cockburn, A., & Highsmith, J. (2001). Agile software development: The people factor. Computer, 34(11), 131-133.        
[15] Lee, G., & Xia, W. (2010). Toward agile: An integrated analysis of quantitative and qualitative field data on software development agility. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 87-114.   
[16] Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology, 50(9-10), 833-859.             
[17] Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., & Moe, N. B. (2012). A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(6), 1213-1221.
[18] Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.
[19] Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2011). Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-government phenomena. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 329-345.            
[20] Janowski, T. (2015). Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 221-236.       
[21] Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122-136.
[22] Andersen, K. V., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2006). E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 236-248. 
[23] Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Pardo, T. A. (2005). E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly, 22(2), 187-216.          
[24] Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3), 264-271.  
[25] Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2013). Local e-government in the United States: Transformation or incremental change? Public Administration Review, 73(1), 165-175.
[26] Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2011). The trouble with transparency: A critical review of openness in e-government. Policy & Internet, 3(1), 1-30.
Advanced Journal of Management, Humanity and Social Science
Volume 2, Issue 1
January 2025
Pages 93-104

Home

Editorial Board

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us