[1] L. Yan, S. Greiff, Z. Teuber, D. Gasevic, Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning, Nature Human Behaviour, 2024, 8, 1839-1850.
[2] R. Deng, M. Jiang, X. Yu, Y. Lu, S. Liu, Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies, Computers & Education, 2025, 227, 105224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105224
[3] M.Y.I. Helal, I.A. Elgendy, M.A. Alb Ashrawi, Y.K. Dwivedi, M.S. Al-Ahmadi, I. Jeon, the impact of generative AI on critical thinking skills: A systematic review, conceptual framework and future research directions, Information Discovery and Delivery, 2025, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-05-2025-0125
[4] N. Cong-Lem, N.T. Thuy-Dung, towards a framework for understanding and assessing critical thinking in generative AI-enhanced learning environments: A scoping review, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2026, 41(2), Article 41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-026-01089-y
[5] S. Tao, M. Lan, M. Wang, H. Li, Potential risks of generative artificial intelligence integration into K-12 education: A scoping review, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2026, 10, 100561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100561
[6] Y. Fan, L. Tang, H. Le, K. Shen, S. Tan, Y. Zhao, Y. Shen, X. Li, D. Gasevic, Beware of metacognitive laziness: Effects of generative artificial intelligence on learning motivation, processes, and performance, British Journal of Educational Technology, 2025, 56(2), 489-530. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13544
[7] G. Brod, Agency does not equal choice: Conceptualizing agency for learning in the age of AI, Learning and Individual Differences, 2026, 125, 102841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102841
[8] G. Brod, E. Holstein, L. Weindorf, J. Colantonio, E. Bonawitz, M. Theobald, do it yourself: Discerning the effects of self-directed activity on conceptual learning, npj Science of Learning, 2025, 10, 70. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00364-9
[9] P.-B. Degen, I. Asanov, beyond automation: Socratic AI, epistemic agency, and the implications of the emergence of orchestrated multi-agent learning architectures, arXiv, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.05116
[10] J. Lee, J.-T. Hung, M.Y. Soylu, D. Popescu, C.Z. Cui, G. Grigoryan, D.A. Joyner, S.W. Harmon, Socratic Mind: Impact of a novel GenAI-powered assessment tool on student learning and higher-order thinking, arXiv, 2025. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.16262
[11] J. Reeve, C.-M. Tseng, Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2011, 36(4), 257-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
[12] C. Mameli, S. Passini, Development and validation of an enlarged version of the Student Agentic Engagement Scale, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2019, 37(4), 450-463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282918757849
[13] R.M. Ryan, E.L. Deci, Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2020, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
[14] X. Fang, J. Feng, Research on the application behavior of generative artificial intelligence learning of college students based on self-determination theory, Frontiers in Psychology, 2026, 17, 1805498. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1805498
[15] H. Galindo-Dominguez, N. Delgado, M.V. Urruzola, J.M. Etxabe, L. Campo, using artificial intelligence to promote adolescents’ learning motivation: A longitudinal intervention from self-determination theory, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2025, 41(2), e70020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.70020
[16] L. Zhang, W. Zhang, integrating large language models into project-based learning based on self-determination theory, Interactive Learning Environments, 2025, 33(5), 3580-3592. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2446535
[17] S. Choi, H. Kim, The impact of a large language model-based programming learning environment on students’ motivation and programming ability, Education and Information Technologies, 2025, 30(6), 8109-8138.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13107-x
[18] E. Crocetti, M. Pagano, F. De Lise, F. Maratia, B. Bobba, W. Meeus, V. Bacaro, Promoting adolescents’ personal and social identities: A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions, Identity, 2025, 25(2), 167-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2024.2394888
[19] E. Crocetti, F. De Lise, M. Pagano, B. Bobba, F. Maratia, W. Meeus, V. Bacaro, What’s your vocation? A meta-analysis of interventions tackling youth educational and professional identity, Identity, 2025, 25(2), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2024.2394861
[20] Rezai, R. Ahmadi, P. Ashkani, G.H. Hosseini, implementing active learning approach to promote motivation, reduce anxiety, and shape positive attitudes: A case study of EFL learners, Acta Psychologica, 2025, 253, 104704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104704
[21] J.A. Alqurni, Exploring the role of agentic AI in fostering self-efficacy, autonomy support, and self-learning motivation in higher education, Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2026, 9, 1738774. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1738774
[22] M. Badali, M. Shah Alizadeh, M. Alimirzaie, O. Noroozi, S.K. Bani Hashem, Bridging AI chatbot use and critical thinking: The mediating role of AI literacy, Interactive Learning Environments, 2026, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2605487
[23] Y. Zhao, Y. Yue, Z. Sun, Q. Jiang, G. Li, does generative artificial intelligence improve students’ higher-order thinking? A meta-analysis based on 29 experiments and quasi-experiments, Journal of Intelligence, 2025, 13(12), 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13120160
[24] F. Shirdel, N. Mobasheri, M.H. Kaveh, J. Hassanzadeh, L. Ghahremani, A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of a theory of planned behavior-based educational intervention in reducing internet addiction among adolescent girls in southern Iran, Adolescents, 2025, 5(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/adolescents5030033
[25] S. Bashirinia, N. Motamed, M. Bahreini, M. Ravani pour, The effects of an empowering self-management model on sense of coherence and self-efficacy among adolescent girls with internet addiction in Bushehr, Iran: A randomized controlled trial, BMC Public Health, 2026, 26, 424. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-26117-2
[26] K. Skivington, L. Matthews, S.A. Simpson, P. Craig, J. Baird, J.M. Blazeby, K.A. Boyd, N. Craig, D.P. French, E. McIntosh, M. Petticrew, J. Rycroft-Malone, M. White, L. Moore, A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research Council guidance, BMJ, 2021, 374, n2061.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061
[27] T.C. Hoffmann, P.P. Glasziou, I. Boutron, R. Milne, R. Perera, D. Moher, D.G. Altman, V. Barbour, H. Macdonald, M. Johnston, S.E. Lamb, M. Dixon-Woods, P. McCulloch, J.C. Wyatt, A.-W. Chan, S. Michie, better reporting of interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (Tidier) checklist and guide, BMJ, 2014, 348, g1687. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1687
[28] A.-W. Chan, I. Boutron, S. Hopewell, D. Moher, K.F. Schulz, G.S. Collins, et al., SPIRIT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for protocols of randomized trials, BMJ, 2025, 389, e081477.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081477
[29] S. Hopewell, A.-W. Chan, G.S. Collins, A. Hrobjartsson, D. Moher, K.F. Schulz, et al., CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomized trials, BMJ, 2025, 389, e081123.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081123
[30] Baba, M. Smith, B.K. Potter, A.-W. Chan, D. Moher, A. Toulany, et al., CONSORT-Children and Adolescents (CONSORT-C) 2026 extension statement: Enhancing the reporting and impact of pediatric randomized trials, JAMA Pediatrics, 2026, 180(4), 413-425. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.0104
[31] R.J. Vallerand, L.G. Pelletier, M.R. Blais, N.M. Briere, C. Senecal, E.F. Vallieres, The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1992, 52(4), 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025
[32] N. Bagheri, M. Shahraray, V. Farzad, Standardization of Academic Motivation Scale (AMS) among the high school students in Tehran, Clinical Psychology and Personality, 2003, 1(1), 11-24. https://cpap.shahed.ac.ir/article_2771.html?lang=en
[33] J. Cavoukian, P. Kadivar, M. Shahraray, A.A. Sheikhi Fini, V. Farzad, Standardization of the Vallerand Academic Motivation Scale, Journal of Educational Sciences, 2010, 5(4), 103-130. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/922938/
[34] J.C. Ricketts, The Efficacy of Leadership Development, Critical Thinking Dispositions, and Student Academic Performance, doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, 2003.
https://ufdc.ufl.edu/UFE0000777/00001
[35] H. Pakmehr, F. Mirdoraghi, A. Ghanaei Chamanabad, M. Karami, Reliability, validity and factor analysis of Ricketts’ Critical Thinking Disposition Scales in high school, Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 2013, 4(11), 33-54. https://jem.atu.ac.ir/article_2678_en.html
[36] F. Miao, W. Holmes, Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research, UNESCO, Paris, 2023. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000386693
[37] F. Miao, K. Shiohira, N. Lao, AI Competency Framework for Students, UNESCO, Paris, 2024. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391105
[38] S. Gupta, S. Grover, V. Menon, P.V. Indu, K. Vidhu Kumar, D. Chacko, Item generation and establishing face and content validity of a rating scale: A primer, Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 2025, 67(8), 816-822. https://doi.org/10.4103/indianjpsychiatry_750_25
[39] O. Quintin, J. Kasza, N. Davies, S. Markham, R. Hooper, Small numbers of clusters in cluster randomized trials: A scoping review of problems and proposed solutions, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2026, online ahead of print, 112395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112395
[40] A.-L. Schubert, M. Steinhilber, H. Kang, D.S. Quintana, Improving statistical reporting in psychology, Communications Psychology, 2025, 3, 156.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00356-w
[41] F.L. Huang, when cluster-robust inferences fail, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2026, 86(3), 579-601. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131644251393203
[42] I.A. Canay, A. Santos, A.M. Shaikh, The wild bootstrap with a “small” number of “large” clusters, Review of Economics and Statistics, 2021, 103(2), 346-363. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00887
[43] S. Grund, O. Lüdtke, A. Robitzsch, Multiple imputation of multilevel data with single-level models: A fully conditional specification approach using adjusted group means, Behavior Research Methods, 2026, 58, 76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-025-02915-9
