Advanced Journal of Management, Humanity and Social Science

Designing a Meritocracy System in Public Organizations Using Competency-Based Management and Performance Analytics

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Reza Salimi Beni

Master of Science in Information Technology Management,Islamic Azad University, Electronic Campus,Tehran,  Iran

10.5281/zenodo.23927666
Abstract
Public organizations need appointment and advancement systems that connect demonstrable capability with public service results while protecting equal opportunity and administrative impartiality. Competency frameworks often describe desirable behavior without specifying how evidence should influence employment decisions. Performance dashboards can make decisions more consistent but may also reward favorable assignments, reproduce historical disadvantage, or obscure political intervention. This article develops an integrated meritocracy system through a targeted synthesis of recent academic and institutional publications from 2024–2026 and an explicit design analysis. The study produces a role-based competency architecture, a contextualized performance measurement model, an auditable decision process, and a prospective validation protocol. Its central design principle is to distinguish eligibility, evidence sufficiency, comparative assessment, and final authorization. Integrity requirements and essential competencies operate as noncompensatory conditions; a transparent composite supports comparison only after these conditions are satisfied. A worked example with six entirely hypothetical candidates demonstrates score calculation, uncertainty bounds, sensitivity to policy weights, and the consequences of missing evidence. The example shows why a small numerical advantage cannot establish a defensible appointment when rankings reverse under plausible weighting changes. The proposed system links decisions to development opportunities, independent review, documented reasons, and monitoring of distributional effects. The results are analytical design outputs, not findings from an implemented organization or evidence of causal effectiveness. Future evaluation should examine measurement validity, procedural justice, service quality, and administrative costs through a staged pilot with independent assessment. The article contributes a practical account of meritocracy as a governed evidentiary process rather than an unqualified ranking of employees.

Graphical Abstract

Designing a Meritocracy System in Public Organizations Using Competency-Based Management and Performance Analytics

Keywords

meritocracy
public organizations
competency-based management
performance analytics
procedural justice
Subjects
[1]    Oliveira, E., Abner, G., Lee, S., Suzuki, K., Hur, H., & Perry, J. L. (2024). What does the evidence tell us about merit principles and government performance? Public Administration, 102(2), 668-690.       
[2]    Goulden, A. (2025). Capability Building, Management and Reform: An Initial Review of Public Sector Competency Frameworks. UCL Institute for Innovation and Public Purpose Working Paper 2025-15. 
[3]    Burtscher, M., Piano, S., & Welby, B. (2024). Developing skills for digital government: A review of good practices across OECD governments. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 303. OECD Publishing.
[4]    OECD. (2025). Government at a Glance 2025. OECD Publishing. 
[5]    OECD. (2025). Workforce Insights from Central Governments: Findings of the 2024 OECD/EU Survey of Public Servants. OECD Publishing.
[6]    Wightman, G. B., & Christensen, R. K. (2025). A systematic review of person–environment fit in the public sector: Theorizing a multidimensional model. Public Administration Review, 85(2), 386-401.  
[7]    Alam, S., Dong, Z., Kularatne, I., & Rashid, M. S. (2026). Exploring approaches to overcome challenges in adopting human resource analytics through stakeholder engagement. Management Review Quarterly, 76, 729-787. Published online in 2025.       
[8]    Bandara, R. J., Biswas, K., Akter, S., Shafique, S., & Rahman, M. (2025). Addressing algorithmic bias in AI-driven HRM systems: Implications for strategic HRM effectiveness. Human Resource Management Journal, 35, 1047-1063.
[9]    Naoum, R. F., Szakadáti, T., & Balogh, G. (2026). Artificial Intelligence (AI) in human resource management (HRM): A systematic review of its dual impact on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI). Management Review Quarterly.
[10]Milanez, A., Lemmens, A., & Ruggiu, C. (2025). Algorithmic management in the workplace: New evidence from an OECD employer survey. OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, 31. OECD Publishing.           
[11] Rani, U., Pesole, A., & González Vázquez, I. (2024). Algorithmic Management Practices in Regular Workplaces: Case Studies in Logistics and Healthcare. Publications Office of the European Union.      
[12]Autio, C., Schwartz, R., Dunietz, J., Jain, S., Stanley, M., Tabassi, E., Hall, P., & Roberts, K. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile. NIST AI 600-1. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
[13] Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. (2024). Responsible AI in Recruitment. UK Government.
[14] Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. (2025). Data and AI Ethics Framework. UK Government. Updated 18 December 2025.         
[15] Government Digital Service. (2024). Algorithmic Transparency Recording Standard Mandatory Scope and Exemptions Policy. UK Government.
[16] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024). United Nations E-Government Survey 2024: Accelerating Digital Transformation for Sustainable Development. United Nations.          
[17] OECD. (2024). Global Trends in Government Innovation 2024: Fostering Human-Centred Public Services. OECD Publishing.       
[18] OECD. (2024). OECD Survey on Drivers of Trust in Public Institutions 2024 Results: Building Trust in a Complex Policy Environment. OECD Publishing.           
[19] OECD. (2024). Anti-Corruption and Integrity Outlook 2024. OECD Publishing.        
[20] OECD. (2025). Governing with Artificial Intelligence: The State of Play and Way Forward in Core Government Functions. OECD Publishing.
[21]OECD. (2026). Building an AI-ready public workforce: Implications and strategies. OECD Publishing.
[22] OECD. (2026). A Skills-First Labour Market. Getting Skills Right. OECD Publishing.             
[23] OECD. (2025). OECD Skills Outlook 2025. OECD Publishing.     
[24] Information Commissioner's Office. (2024). ICO intervention into AI recruitment tools leads to better data protection for job seekers. 6 November 2024.
OECD. (2026). Digital Government Outlook 2026: From Foundations to Transformational Impact. OECD Publishing.
Advanced Journal of Management, Humanity and Social Science
Volume 2, Issue 5
September and October 2026
Pages 527-544

Home

Editorial Board

Guide for Authors

Submit Manuscript

Contact Us